Learning curves and surgical outcomes for proctored adoption of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: cumulative sum curve analysis.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) is an effective and well-recognised treatment for symptoms of obstructive defecation in the context of rectal prolapse and recto-rectal intussusception. However, due to the technical complexity of VMR, a significant learning curve has been previously described. This paper examines the effect of proctored adoption of VMR on learning curves, operative times, and outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective database analysis of two district general hospitals was conducted, with inclusion of all cases performed by two surgeons since first adoption of the procedure in 2007-2015. Operative time, length of stay, and in-hospital complications were evaluated, with learning curves assessed using cumulative sum curves. RESULTS: Three hundred and eleven patients underwent VMR during the study period and were included for analysis. Patients were near-equally distributed between surgeons (surgeon A: n = 151, surgeon B, n = 160) with no significant differences between gender, age, or ASA grade. In-hospital morbidity was 3.2 %, with 0 % mortality. Cumulative sum curve analysis suggested a change point of between 25 and 30 cases based on operative times and length of stay and was similar between both surgeons. No significant change point was seen for morbidity or mortality. CONCLUSION: VMR is an effective and safe treatment for rectal prolapse. Surgeons in this study were proctored during the adoption process by another surgeon experienced in VMR; this may contribute to increased safety and abbreviated learning curve. In the context of proctored adoption, this study estimates a learning curve of 25-30 cases, without detrimental impact on patient outcomes.

Does the addition of a fundoplication improve outcomes for patients undergoing laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy?

Laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy is a well-established technique in the treatment of achalasia. However, the addition of a routine fundoplication as part of this procedure remains controversial. A best evidence topic in upper gastrointestinal surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed whether the addition of a fundoplication improved clinical outcomes. Two hundred and seven papers were found using the reported search and of these, 8 papers were identified using a pre-determined criteria as representing the best answer to this clinical question. There were 2 meta-analyses, 3 randomised controlled trials and 3 prospective series. The author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group, study type, relevant outcomes, results, and study weaknesses of these papers are tabulated. Review of the data shows that the rates of gastro-oesophageal reflux both on pH monitoring and symptom reporting are all reduced when an anti-reflux procedure is added to a Heller's cardiomyotomy. In terms of the choice of the anti-reflux procedure, comparison between the Dor anterior and Toupet posterior fundoplications do not show any obvious clinical differences, however dysphagia appears to be lower in those undergoing partial fundoplication as compared to a Nissen fundoplication.

The accuracy of automatic calibration of digital pelvic radiographs using two different scale markers: a comparative study.

We have investigated the accuracy of automatic calibration of digital pelvic radiographs using the single and double marker techniques. Both markers were applied by the radiographer at the time of routine, postoperative radiographs. Each radiograph was loaded into the TraumaCad(TM) software package which calculated the magnification and scaled the radiograph automatically. The median error of magnification in the double marker group was 1.14% when calculated automatically. The median error of the single marker was 5.98%. The relationship between true and predicted magnification was strongest in the double marker group with excellent correlation (r=0.91) and agreement (ICC<0.91). We believe that the double marker method with automatic calibration is the most reliable method of scaling a pelvic radiograph in clinical practice currently available.